Proven to help patients
achieve more “On” time

Superior improvement in daily good “On” time and “Off” time vs oral IR CD/LD1*

Clinically proven to help patients achieve more “On” time without troublesome dyskinesia

Primary endpoint:
Mean change from baseline to week 12 in total daily mean “On” time without
troublesome dyskinesia‡§

VYALEV

+  hours

Baseline:
9.20 hours
(n=73)

Oral IR CD/LD

+ hours

Baseline:
9.49 hours
(n=67)

~3x

increase in daily
good “On” time
vs oral IR CD/LD1*

Mean difference=1.75 hours; P=0.0083

*Good “On” time (“On” time without troublesome dyskinesia) was defined as the sum of “On” time without dyskinesia and “On” time with non-troublesome dyskinesia and was assessed using a PD diary.1

2.80x increase.1

The “On” and “Off” time were normalized to a daily 16-hour awake period. Daily normalized "Off" and "On" times are averaged over valid PD diary days for each visit to obtain the average daily normalized times.1

§Data based on least squares mean.1

Clinically proven to help patients reduce their daily “Off” time

Secondary endpoint:
Mean change from baseline to week 12 in hours of averaged daily normalized "Off" time‡§

VYALEV

 hours

Baseline:
6.34 hours
(n=73)

Oral IR CD/LD

 hours

Baseline:
5.91 hours
(n=67)

~3x

decrease in daily
“Off” time vs
oral IR CD/LD1†

Mean difference=–1.79 hours; P=0.0054

*Good “On” time (“On” time without troublesome dyskinesia) was defined as the sum of “On” time without dyskinesia and “On” time with non-troublesome dyskinesia and was assessed using a PD diary.1

2.86x decrease.1

The “On” and “Off” time were normalized to a daily 16-hour awake period. Daily normalized "Off" and "On" times are averaged over valid PD diary days for each visit to obtain the average daily normalized times.1

§Data based on least squares mean.1

Study Design: VYALEV was studied in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, 12-week, multicenter study in 141 patients|| with advanced PD whose motor fluctuations were inadequately controlled by their current medication. One VYALEV patient was not evaluable for the efficacy analysis.1

||Of the 141 patients who were randomly assigned in the trial, 110 completed the study. Of the 74 patients randomized to receive VYALEV, 48 completed the study and 26 discontinued treatment. Of the 67 patients randomized to receive oral IR CD/LD, 62 completed the study and 5 discontinued treatment.2

Good “On” time throughout the day at week 123*

83%.

83% of VYALEV patients reported waking up in the good “On” state at week 12

Post hoc analysis

Percentage of Patients (n=46)
Hours After Waking
  • %
  • %
  • %
  • %

Study Design: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study. Reported is good “On” time throughout the day at week 12 normalized to a 16-hour awake period.

Limitations: Data are from a post hoc analysis; no conclusions of statistical significance can be drawn.

“On” status was self-reported by a cohort of study participants. Patients recorded their status only during waking hours. Waking time was defined as the first diary entry that did not report "asleep" (recorded within 30 minutes of waking).

*Good “On” time (“On” time without troublesome dyskinesia) was defined as the sum of “On” time without dyskinesia and “On” time with non-troublesome dyskinesia and was assessed using a PD diary.3

Observed reduction in sleep disturbances at week 124

In patients with advanced Parkinson's disease

LS mean change from baseline to week 12 in PDSS-2 total score​

  •  0
  • -1
  • -2
  • -3
  • -4
  • -5
  • -6
  • -7
  • -8
  • -9

Oral IR CD/LD

(n=59)

-2.52

13%

Change

from BL of 18.71

VYALEV

(n=44)

-7.92

36%

Change

from BL of 21.70

Change from baseline to week 12 in sleep symptoms as assessed by the PDSS-2 was a prespecified secondary endpoint.2

VYALEV is indicated for the treatment of motor fluctuations in adults with advanced Parkinson’s disease.1

Limitations: PDSS-2 was a ranked secondary endpoint in the registrational 12-week study. Due to nonsignificant results for endpoints higher in the testing hierarchy, these results are observational in nature and any comparisons between treatment arms should be interpreted with caution.

The Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2) is a patient-completed clinical rating scale that assesses the frequency of sleep disturbances in patients with PD. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with lower scores indicating fewer sleep disturbances. The scale consists of 15 questions that are grouped into 3 subdomains:

Motor symptoms
at night

PD symptoms
at night

Disturbed sleep

VYALEV is indicated for the treatment of motor fluctuations in adults with advanced Parkinson’s disease.1

Limitations: PDSS-2 was a ranked secondary endpoint in the registrational 12-week study. Due to nonsignificant results for endpoints higher in the testing hierarchy, these results are observational in nature and any comparisons between treatment arms should be interpreted with caution.

Review the safety profile of VYALEV.

BL=baseline; CD=carbidopa; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; IR=immediate release; LS=least squares; LD=levodopa; PD=Parkinson’s disease.